PC/PBT Tow Hook Cover
Multi-Slider Mold with DFM Risk Resolution
Tier-1 supplier to a European luxury automaker · Family mold (1+1) · 250,000-shot production run
7 days
Drawing to DFM sign-off
4 + 3
Sliders + lifters
250K
Forecast mold life (shots)
BACKGROUND
A Tier-1 supplier to a European luxury automaker required injection molds for a front and rear tow hook cover set. The parts are visible exterior trim on a premium passenger vehicle, demanding high dimensional accuracy, consistent surface finish, and reliable long-run tooling. The supplier needed a mold house that could deliver a thorough DFM review,not just tool fabrication.
PART SPECIFICATIONS
Rear tow hook cover:3D geometry (rear view)
Front tow hook cover: 3D geometry (front view)
Material
PC/PBT blend, medium grey
Shrinkage Rate
0.8% (X/Y/Z isotropic)
Rear Part Size
180 x 58 x 51 mm
Front Part Size
150 x 67 x 47 mm
Wall Thickness
3.0 mm nominal
Cavity Steel
1.2343 · HRC 52-54
Gate Type
Sub-gate via hot runner
Machine Tonnage
100T (tie bar 420 mm)
CHALLENGES
Multiple undercut directions requiring 4 independent sliders with coordinated sequencing
Three internal undercuts needing lifters, with split-line management to minimise witness marks
PC/PBT blend sensitivity to gate location — weld lines and sink marks needed careful analysis
Customer mold specification with specific locating ring, ejector rod, and connector standards to comply with
DFM PROCESS& PROACTIVE RISK RESOLUTION
A full Design for Manufacturability review was conducted covering parting line definition, slider and lifter layout, core/cavity insert design for rib venting, ejector pin placement, draft angle analysis, and wall thickness uniformity.
Parting Line Definition
Rear cover — parting line along outermost edge
Front cover — parting line along outermost edge
Slider And Lifter Layout (4 Sliders)
Rear cover — slider 1 & 2 configuration
Rear cover — slider 1 & 2 configuration
Key Risk Caught During DFM
A structural bridge in the part geometry was only 3 mm wide — too narrow to position standard ejector pins without risking stress concentration and premature mold fatigue. Rather than proceeding, we flagged the issue, proposed a geometry modification, and obtained customer sign-off before cutting steel. This single intervention meaningfully extended projected tool life.
Mold Build
The finished mold used 1.2343 tool steel throughout (cavity HRC 52-54, core HRC 45-52, sliders and lifters HRC 48-50) with a 600# cosmetic polish. A turnable sprue bushing was designed to allow the mold to run either part independently or as a family tool depending on production scheduling.
Cavity side: 4-slider configuration visible
Core side : ejection system and hot runner inlet
Full mold assembly side view
Full mold assembly isometric view
OUTCOMES
DFM signed off with zero revision cycles after customer review